The Phenomena of Music and Language: Aspects of Systematic Typological Comparison (Preliminary Theses)

Abstract

The phrase “musical language” is used so widely in contemporary musicological discourse that many authors and readers persist in the illusory belief that music is one of the varieties of language. Seemingly, Boris Asafyev’s famous dictum (“both verbal and musical types of voicing are different branches of the same acoustic flow,” 1925) tends to reinforce this illusion, which has also given rise to “musical semiotics” as an entire research area. The present essay explores why such ideas are misguided, but examines how this illusion is supported by verifiable observations and sound reasoning. From the viewpoint of mammals’ bioacoustics, it suggests that the human’s zoned ear is a fundamental biological premise for the emergence of both language and music as typologically similar systems of voiced structured temporal acoustic utterances. From the viewpoint of semiotics, the typological difference between language and music as systems of semiotized and desemiotized acoustic utterances is respectively asserted; in addition, the relevance of differentiating music from music culture, which is functionally analogous to differentiating language from language culture, is specially noted. From the viewpoint of dialectics, both language and music are considered the hyper-unity of opposite entities. The research methodology is fundamentally based on Karl Popper’s posited opposition between verifiable and falsifiable scientific concepts (1935) — an opposition which is also considered dialectically.

References

1. Asaf’yev, Boris V. 1965 [1925]. Rechevaya intonatsiya [Speech Intonation]. Moscow — Leningrad: Muzyka.(In Russian).

2. Bonfel’d, Moris Sh. 2006. Muzyka: Yazyk. Rech’. Myshleniye. Opyt sistemnogo issledovaniya muzykal’nogo iskusstva [Music: Language. Speech. Thinking. An Essay on Systematic Study of Musical Art]. St. Petersburg: Kompozitor. (In Russian).

3. Burlak, Svetlana A. 2020. Proiskhozhdeniye yazyka: fakty, issledovaniya, gipotezy [The Origin of Language: Facts, Research, Hypotheses]. 2nd ed. Moscow: Alpina non-fiction. (In Russian).

4. Vishnyatskiy, Leonid B. 2005. Istoriya odnoy sluchaynosti, ili Proiskhozhdeniye cheloveka [The Story of One Accident, or The Origin of Man]. Fryazino: Vek 2. (In Russian).

5. Voloshina, Oksana A. 2010. “O strukture i lingvisticheskoy terminologii grammatiki Panini i eye vliyanii na evropeyskuyu lingvistiku [On the Structure and Linguistic Terminology of Panini’s Grammar and Its Influence on European Linguistics].” Vestnik RGGU. Seriya: Istoriya. Filologiya. Kul’turologiya. Vostokovedeniye [RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. “History. Philology. Culture Studies. Oriental Studies” Series], issue 9 (52), 161–72. (In Russian).

6. Garbuzov, Nikolay A. 1948. Zonnaya priroda zvukovysotnogo slukha [The Zoned Origin of Pitch Ear]. Moscow: USSR Academy of Sciences. (In Russian).

7. Garbuzov, Nikolay A. 1950. Zonnaya priroda tempa i ritma [The Zoned Origin of Tempo and Rhythm]. Moscow: USSR Academy of Sciences. (In Russian).

8. Garbuzov, Nikolay A. 1955. Zonnaya priroda dinamicheskogo slukha [The Zoned Origin of Volume Ear]. Moscow: USSR Academy of Sciences. (In Russian).

9. Garbuzov, Nikolay A. 1956. Zonnaya priroda tembrovogo slukha [The Zoned Origin of Timbre Ear]. Moscow: USSR Academy of Sciences. (In Russian).

10. Gorbatov, Dmitry B. 2020. “Muzyka kak predmet semiotiki: po prochtenii A. F. Loseva [Music as a Subject of Semiotics: after the Reading of A. F. Losev].” In Muzyka — Filosofiya — Kul’tura [Music — Philosophy — Culture]: collection of articles by the participants of the cycle of conferences (2013–2017), edited by: К. V. Zenkin, O. V. Marchenko, E. V. Rovenko. Moscow: Moscow Conservatory Publishing, 41–67. (In Russian).

11. Dulichenko, Alexander D. 1988. “Proekty vseobshchikh i mezhdunarodnykh yazykov. Khronologicheskiy indeks so vtorogo po dvadtsatyi vek [Projects of Universal and Interna tional Languages. Chronological Index from the 2nd to the 20th Centuries].” Uchenye zapiski Tartuskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Scholarly Notes of the Tartu State University], issue 791, 126–62. (In Russian).

12. Losev, Aleksei F. 2012 [1927]. Muzyka kak predmet logiki [Music as a Subject of Logic]. Moscow: Akademicheskiy proekt. (In Russian).

13. Matsuura, Koichiro. 21.02.2007.  “Bol’she poloviny sushchestvuyushchikh v mire yazykov nakhodyatsya na grani ischeznoveniya [More than half of the world’s languages are in danger of extinction].” Available at: https://old.un.by/novosti- oon/v-mire/1630-ru-26-02-07-13 (accessed 01.09.2022; in Russian).

14. Mechkovskaya, Nina B. 2007. Semiotika: Yazyk. Priroda. Kul’tura [Semiotics: Language. Nature. Culture], textbook (course of lectures). 2nd ed. Moscow: Akademiya. (In Russian).

15. Mikhaylov, Dzhivaní K. 1986. “K probleme teorii muzykal’no-kul’turnoy traditsii [On the Issue of the Theory of Musical-Cultural Tradition].” In Muzykal’nye traditsii stran Azii i Afriki [Musical Traditions of Asian and African Countries], collected articles, 3–20. Moscow: Tchaikovsky Moscow State Conservatory. (In Russian).

16. Nikolayeva, Tatiana M. 1990. “Universalii [The Universals].” In Lingvisticheskiy Entsiklopedicheskiy slovar’ [Linguistic Encyclopaedic Dictionary], 535–6. Moscow: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya. (In Russian).

17. Peirce, Charles S. 2000 [1895]. Logicheskiye osnovaniya teorii znakov [Logical Foundation of the Theory of Signs]. Translated from English by Vitaly V. Kiryushchenko and Maksim V. Kolopotin. St. Petersburg: Aletheia. (In Russian).

18. Popper, Karl R. 2005 [1935]. Logika nauchnogo issledovaniya [The Logic of Scientific Discovery / Logik der Forschung]. Translated from English after German, edited by Vadim N. Sadovskiy. Moscow: Respublika. (In Russian).

19. Kholopov, Yury N. 1988. “Lad [Mode].” In Idem. Garmoniya. Teoreticheskiy kurs [Harmony. Theoretical Course], advanced textbook, 28–39. Moscow: Muzyka. (In Russian).

20. Shcherba, Lev V. 1929. “I. A. Boduen de Kurtene i ego znacheniye v nauke o yazyke [J. N. I. Baudouin de Courtenay and His Importance for Linguistics].” Russkiy yazyk v sovetskoy shkole [The Russian Language Course in the Soviet School], issue 6, 63–71. (In Russian).

21. Jakobson, Roman O. 1996 [1968]. “Zhit’ i govorit’ [Vivre et parler],” translated from French by Darya Krotova. In Idem. Yazyk i bessoznatel’noye [The Language and the Unconscious], 198–221. Moscow: Gnozis. (In Russian).

22. Eberhard, David M., Gary F. Simons, and Charles D. Fennig (eds.). 2022. Ethnologue: Languages of the World. Twenty-fifth edition. Dallas, Texas: SIL International. Online version: http://www.ethnologue.com.

23. Hjelmslev, Louis T. 1953 [1943]. Prolegomena to a Theory of Language. Eng. transl. from Danish by F. J. Whitfield. Baltimore: Indiana University Publications in Anthropology and Linguistics.

24. IPA i-charts (2022). International Phonetic Association.org. Available at: http://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/IPAcharts/inter_chart_2018/IPA_2018.html (accessed 01.09.2022).

25. Jerison, Harry J. 1973. Evolution of the Brain and Intelligence. New York [a.o.]: Academic Press.

26. Moseley, Christopher. 2010. Atlas of the World’s Languages in Danger. Paris: UNESCO.

27. Senter, Phil. 2008. “Voices of the Past: a Review of Paleozoic and Mesozoic Animal Sounds.” Historical Biology 20, no. 4: 255–87.

28. Zadeh, Lotfi A. 1965. “Fuzzy Sets.” Information and Control 8, no. 3 (June): 338–53. http://doi.org/ 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X.