The Sacrifice of Isaac in the Music of Britten and Stravinsky: Hidden Rivalry and Creative Polemics

Abstract

The article explores two works of the 20th century composers on the subject of the sacrifice of Isaac: the second canticle of Benjamin Britten and the sacred ballad of Igor Stravinsky. The analysis of the interpretation of the spiritual plot which is extremely important for all monotheistic religions and of the system of musical means used by each of the composers allows us to speak about the polarity of the aesthetic and ethical attitudes of Britten and Stravinsky. It can be assumed that Britten’s music language was not of much interest to Stravinsky and was left by him without attention — but the humanist pathos of the British musician and his critical attitude to the spiritual traditions of Europe got a kind of counterbalance in the form of the sacred ballad “Abraham and Isaac”, whose author represents the “ideal” model of the patriarchal world, where the main value is the unconditional obedience.

References

1. Брагинская Н. Священная баллада И. Стравинского «Авраам и Исаак»: взгляд на восток? // Музыкальная академия. 2011. № 1. С. 153–157.

2. Гливинский В. И. Ф. Стравинский и современные компьютерно-информационные технологии // Opera Musicologica. 2010. № 2 (4). С. 41–57.

3. Гливинский В. Позднее творчество И. Ф. Стравинского. Исследование. Донецк: Донеччина, 1995. 192 с.

4. Игорь Стравинский — публицист и собеседник / ред.-сост. В. Варунц. М.: Советский композитор, 1988. 504 с.

5. Ковнацкая Л. Бенджамин Бриттен. М.: Советский композитор, 1974. 392 с.

6. Орлов Г. «Военный реквием» Бенджамина Бриттена. URL: http://www.opentextnn.ru/music/epoch%20/XX/?id=2682 (дата обращения: 2.11.2016).

7. Савенко С. Мир Стравинского: Монография. М.: Композитор, 2001. 328 с.

8. Селезнёв М. Исаак // Православная энциклопедия / под ред. Патриарха Московского и всея Руси Кирилла. URL: http://www.pravenc.ru/text/674115.html (дата обращения: 21.11.2016).

9. Старостина Т. О гармонии позднего Стравинского // Проблемы музыкальной науки. Вып. 7: Сб. статей / сост. В. Зак, Е. Чигарева М.: Советский композитор, 1989. С. 181–192.

10. Baranova Monighetti T. In between Orthodoxy and Catholicism: The Problem of Stravinsky’s Religious Identity // Igor Stravinsky: Sound and Gesture of Modernism / ed. by M. Locanto. Turnhout: Brepols, 2014. P. 3–29. (Speculum Musicae. Vol. XXV).

11. Buell T. J. The Harmonic Language of Stravinsky’s Abraham and Isaac. URL: http://
www.ex-tempore.org/buell/BUELL.htm
(дата обращения: 21.10.2016).

12. Glivinsky V. Stravinsky, Krenek and Serial-Rotational Technique // Мистецтвознавчi записки. Вып. 28. К.: Мiленiум, 2015. С. 23–34.

13. Mitchell D. (ed. in chief); Reed Ph. (assist. ed.). Letters from a Life: The Selected Letters and Diaries of Benjamin Britten, 1913–1976: in 6 vols. Vol. 1: 1923–1939. Berkeley, L. A. (California): University of California Press, 1991. XXVII, 619 p.

14. Mitchell D. (ed. in chief); Reed Ph. (assist. ed.); Cooke M. (ed.). Letters from a Life: The Selected Letters and Diaries of Benjamin Britten, 1913–1976: in 6 vols. Vol. 3: 1946–1951. Berkeley, L. A. (California): University of California Press, 1991. XXVI, 758 p.

15. Pyke C. Benjamin Britten’s Creative Relationship with Russia. Ph. D. thesis. University of London, 2011. 519 p.

16. Spies С. Notes on Stravinsky’s Abraham and Isaac // Perspectives of New Music. Vol. 3. No. 2 (Spring–Summer, 1965). P. 104–126.

17. Stravinsky I.; Craft R. Dialogues and a Diary. Garden City, N. Y., 1963. 280 p.

18. Walsh S. Stravinsky: The Second Exile: France and America, 1934–1971. N. Y.: Alfred A. Knopf, 2006. 709 p.