As known, postscript in the epistolary responds to author’s need to finish what was left unsaid to the addressee. In music, the semantics of “afterwording” for a number of
reasons manifested itself in a variety of exciting ways among 20th century composers. Moreover, what and how exactly is “afterwording” can be either quite obvious to the listener, or deliberately disguised. The correct understanding of the author’s intentions, the insight on why the composer chooses this particular direction in his work depends on the interpretation of our rather heterogeneous observations. This article is devoted to their preliminary systematization. We will use the metaphor of “afterwording” when discussing from the perspective of cultural studies the following phenomena of modern music:
- “afterwording” as a deliberate, sometimes even emphatically manifested bringing to the logical limit of a certain cultural and historical tradition (for example, the mid-20th-century structuralism can be considered as the apogee of one of the most important vectors in the development of European culture—ratio);
- “afterwording” as an outcome of the phenomenon of repressed culture (this concept implies periods of interrupted evolution of artistic life as a collision of the 20th century; in particular, we are talking about a forced pause between the first and second European avant-garde, as well as about the fate of Russian artists abroad forcibly torn out of the natural channel of creative development);
- “afterwording” of the 19th century in the 20th century as a problem of the correlation between the concepts of “post-romanticism” and “neo-romanticism”, as well as a special pathos of prolonging a fading-away tradition;
- concerning the music of the 2nd half of the 20th century, we can discuss issues such as “afterwording of one’s own” (the phenomenon of “structural twins” by I. Xenakis, P. Boulez, S. Gubaidulina) and “afterwording of someone else’s” (E. Denisov’s “afterwording” of the “Il Canto Sospeso” by L. Nono, A. Webern’s — of the Ricercar from the “Musical Offering” by J. S. Bach).
1. Vladimirskiy, A., ed. 1957. “Iz zapisey Danielya Genri Kanveylera o besedakh s Pikasso [From the Notes of Daniel-Henry Kahnweiler on Conversations with Picasso],” translated from German by Yu. I. Shteinbok. In Pikasso [Picasso], collected papers. Moscow: Izd-vo inostrannoy literatury. Accessed May 8, 2022. http://www.picasso-pablo.ru/library/picasso-sbornik-statey-o-tvorchestve5.html. (In Russian).
2. Korsunskaya, Sofya A. 1999. “Fenomen strukturnoy modeli v kompozitorskom tvorchestve (opyt sravnitel’nogo analiza sochineniy L. Nono i E. Denisova) [The Phenomenon of a Structural Model in Composer’s Work (An Experience of Comparative Analysis of the Works by L. Nono and E. Denisov)].” In Svet. Dobro. Vechnost’. Pamyati Edisona Denisova. Stat’i. Vospominaniya. Materialy [Light. Good. Eternity. In memory of Edison Denisov. Articles. Memories. Materials], compiled and edited by Valeriya S. Tsenova, 422–32. Moscow: Moskovskaya gosudarstvennaya konservatoriya. (In Russian).
3. Nazaykinskiy, Evgeniy. V. 1982. Logika musykal’noy kompositsii [Logics of Musical Composition]. Moscow: Muzyka. (In Russian).
4. Sokolov, Аlexander S. 1992. Muzykal’naya kompozitsiya 20 veka: dialektika tvorchestva [Musical Composition of the 20th Century: Dialectics of Creativity]. Moscow: Moskovskaya gos. konservatoriya, 1992. (In Russian).
5. France, Anatole. 1970. Prestuplenie Sil’vestra Bonara, akademika [The Crime of Sylvestre Bonnard (Member of the Institute)]. Translated from French by Evgeniy F. Korsh. Moscow: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1970. (In Russian).
6. Boulez, Pierre, and Andrew Gerzso. 1988. “Computers in Music.” Scientific American 258, no. 4 (April): 44–50. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24989050.
7. Grisey, Gérard. 2008. Ecrits ou L’invention de la musique spectrale. Paris: MF.
8. Xenakis, Iannis. 1992. Formalized Music. Thought and Mathematics in Composition, additional material compiled and edited by Sharon Kanach. Harmonologia Series 6.
Stuyvesant, N.Y.: Pendragon Press.