Theology of Bach’s Passions through Herzliebster Jesu by J. Heermann: Lutheran Theosis?

Богословие Страстей И. С. Баха сквозь призму песни И. Хермана Herzliebster Jesu: феосис по-лютерански?

The essence of this article is an attempt to interpret of St. John Passion and St. Matthew Passion by J. S. Bach as a single theological concept, consisting of two parts. This concept can be considered as sui generis counterpart to the Eastern Christian idea of divinization (theosis); M. Luther laid its foundations, but it was finally developed in the Passions by Bach, who relied on the traditions of Lutheran piety presented primarily in church hymns. The hypothesis of the article is that Bach did not accidentally use the various stanzas of J. Heermann’s Passion hymn Herzliebster Jesu in both works; to set forth his own version of the theory of atonement, he combines, following Heermann, two theological motives ‒ Jesus as Messiah and as embodiment of Divine Love. The complex relationship of these motives is reflected in the musical symbolism of the two masterpieces and in the features of their libretti. At the same time, the point of view widespread in Western musicology is challenged, according to which St. John Passion and St. Matthew Passion express two opposite, mutually exclusive doctrines of atonement, which supposedly coexisted in Lutheranism from the very beginning of its history.


1.   Kozlov, M. (n. d.). Protestantizm [Protestantism]. Available at: (accessed 10.07.2019).

2.   Nasonov, R. A. (2006). Put’ Spaseniya, proydennyy s I. S. Bakhom (osmyslenie evangel’skogo teksta v «Strastyakh po Ioannu») [The Way of Salvation, Passed with J. S. Bach (Understanding of the Gospel Text in the St. John Passion)]. In Muzyka i propoved’. K interpretatsii naslediya I. S. Bakha [Music and Sermon: To the Interpretation of the Heritage of J. S. Bach], 64–80. Moscow, Moskovskaya gosudarstvennaya konservatoriya imeni P. I. Chaykovskogo.

3.   Ogitskiy, D., Kozlov, M. (1995). Pravoslavie i Zapadnoe khristianstvo [Orthodoxy and Western Christianity]. Moscow, Otchiy dom. Available at: http://ипби.рф/images/Bibl/PZH.pdf (accessed 10.07.2019).

4.   Althaus, P. (1966). The Theology of Martin Luther, transl. by R. C. Schultz. Philadelphia, Fortress.

5.   Aulén, G. (1931). Christus Victor. An Historical Study of the Three Main Types of the Idea of the Atonement, authorized translation by A. G. Hebert. London, SPCK.

6.   Axmacher, E. (1984). “Aus Liebe will mein Heyland sterben”: Untersuchung zum Wandel des Passionsverständnisses im frühen 18. Jahrhundert. Neuhausen-Stuttgart, Hänssler.

7.   Berger, K. (2007). Bach’s Cycle, Mozart’s Arrow: An Essay on the Origins of Musical Modernit y. Berkeley and London, University of California Press.

8.   Chafe, E. (2014). J.S.Bach and Johannine Theology. The St. John Passion and Cantatas for Spring 1725. New York, Oxford University Press.

9.   Evenson, G. O. (1957). Critique of Aulén’s Christus Victor. Concordia Theological Monthly, Vol. 28, No. 10, 738–49.

10.  Gardiner, J. E. (2014). Music in the Castle of Heaven: A Portrait of Johann Sebastian Bach. London, Penguin.

11.  Pelikan, J. (2003). Bach Among the Theologians. Eugene, Wipf & Stock.